CTA
Small fontsize
Medium fontsize
Big fontsize
English |
Switch to English
Français
Switch to French
Filter by Agriculture topics
Commodities
Regions
Publication Type
Filter by date

TRALAC reports uneven progress in SADC trade integration

05 August 2013

According to analysis published by the South Africa-based Trade Law Centre (TRALAC), the SADC Free Trade Area (FTA) agreement shows wide variations in implementation. Imports from SADC Trade Protocol signatories into the Southern African Customs Union (SACU) are “largely tariff free”, while Angola, the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) and Seychelles “remain outside of the agreement”. Other members “largely honour the agreement, with several notable and sometimes important exceptions”.

While a nominal FTA was held to be in existence since 2008, “SADC considers that the maximum tariff liberalisation was only attained in January 2012, when the tariff phase-down process for sensitive products was completed.” However, for Mozambique the phasing-out of tariffs on sensitive products will only be completed in 2015, while Malawi, Zimbabwe and Tanzania have derogations, particularly for sugar, where regional trade liberalisation remains problematical (e.g., under the SADC Trade Protocol, quota restrictions are placed on access for sugar exports from SADC countries to the SACU markets, while no SADC member state grants tariff concessions to sugar imports from SACU members). There are also product exclusions from tariff elimination commitments, for example, for prepared foodstuffs and animal products.

At the country level, the report notes that Tanzania seems to be “far from offering duty-free access to South Africa, with extreme tariffs reported for rice, sugar, milk products and cereals in particular”, while in 2012 in Mozambique, “there seemed to be tariffs on all agricultural imports… from South Africa”. Madagascar, for its part, charges a 20% duty on live animals, meat, fish and fruit and vegetable products from South Africa.

Nevertheless, South Africa plays a dominant role in trade flows (68.1% of intra-SADC exports), being the main export destination for 3 of the 15 SADC countries and the main source of imports for 8 of the 15 SADC countries. Analysts suggest that the share of SADC in South Africa’s exports has risen from 8.2% in 2007 to 11.9% in 2011, with the total value increasing from US$7,735 million to US$10,398 million.

Analysts note that since the launch of the SADC FTA in 2000, “intra-SADC trade nearly doubled from US$5.02 billion in 2000 to US$10 billion in 2010”, but that, as a share of total exports, trade has “remained fairly constant”, despite the lowering of tariffs that has taken place. It is maintained that data shortcomings and problems of interpretation make it difficult to draw firm conclusions.

Overall, the SADC FTA is seen as making solid progress on the implementation of tariff elimination commitments, although there remains “quite some distance to travel”. However, the review of trade data for SADC countries shows that “intra-SADC trade is low” and “not necessarily increasing”.

Editorial comment

While solid progress has been recorded in tariff dismantling under the SADC Trade Protocol, an earlier TRALAC review published in September 2012 noted that commitments related to the elimination of existing non-tariff barriers (NTBs) and non-introduction of new NTBs remained largely unfulfilled (see Agritrade article ‘ SADC: Progress on tariff liberalisation but less on NTBs’, 2 December 2012). Indeed, TRALAC analysts have suggested that there is little appetite among many SADC member states for greater integration on “behind-border” issues (regulatory harmonisation, customs coordination, trade facilitation, etc.).

The lack of appeals and dispute settlement mechanisms for non-implementation of SADC Trade Protocol commitments is seen as an important factor constraining intra-regional trade development, particular for agro-food products. In addition, the failure to elaborate general provisions, linked to possible exceptions to regional trade policy commitments in a more detailed fashion, is reportedly providing scope for backtracking on tariff liberalisation measures already entered into.

Despite these shortcomings – primarily affecting South African exporters – the share of SADC in South Africa’s exports has risen from 8.2% in 2007 to 11.9% in 2011, with the value in US dollar terms increasing by 34% between 2007 and 2011. This suggests that factors other than tariff liberalisation are driving South African exports to the region.

These developments raise the question: if tariffs were to be fully eliminated and non-tariff barriers dismantled on South African exports to the SADC region, how much greater would South Africa’s expansion of exports to the SADC region have been? This, no doubt, is causing pause for thought among members of the wider tripartite FTA configuration. 

Comment

Terms and conditions