In a recent national press interview, the Chair of Cameroon’s National Committee for Coordination and Follow-up of its EPA, Chantal Elombat, acknowledged the difficulties being encountered by the CEMAC zone as a region in negotiating an EPA with the EU. Following a call from heads of state and government in October 2009 for concerted action on the EPA negotiations, central African governments hope to organise a series of regional meetings to iron out the remaining differences and ensure regional integration among themselves before continuing the negotiations with the EU.
Mme Elombat also pointed out a number of concerns which have hindered progress in the negotiations: apart from being too short, the two-year period for the completion of the EPA included in the agreement initialled by Cameroon contains many rendezvous clauses which the EU has not met. Issues on rules of origin and a legally binding EPA financial programme of support have still not been settled. Central African negotiators view the financial assistance currently available as insufficient (and largely inaccessible) for dealing with the likely adjustment costs and restructuring challenges related to competitiveness. It is also reported that Cameroon’s Minister for the Economy and Planning has requested the EC to extend the deadline for dismantling of tariffs due to commence in Cameroon on 1 January 2010, given the delay in various aspects of the regional interim EPAs.
Cameroon Tribune, 24 December 2009
http://www.cameroon-tribune.cm/article.php?lang=Fr&oled=j24122009&am...
Cameroon Tribune, 24 December 2009
http://www.cameroon-tribune.cm/article.php?lang=Fr&oled=j24122009&am...
Bilateral.org, 17 December 2009
http://www.bilaterals.org/article.php3?id_article=16516
EC, DT Trade, information note on GSP+ application procedures, 17 November 2009
http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2009/november/tradoc_145451.pdf









Since February 2009, no substantive EPA negotiating sessions have taken place, and Cameroon’s recent request to the EC for an extension of the deadline for tariff dismantling stipulated in the initialled EPA is yet to receive any response from the EC. Despite the fact that the members of the central Africa group held very few technical meetings in 2009, they are hopeful that with the new governments in place in Gabon and the Republic of Congo they will be able to agree dates for such meetings.
It is worth pointing out that Gabon and the Republic of Congo, as non-LDCs, are the two countries in central Africa that do not benefit from any trade preferences from the EU beyond the GSP. They have not initialled an interim EPA, and are still to ratify one of the treaties required to be eligible for the GSP+ scheme (application guidelines for which have recently been posted on the web by DG Trade). Although negotiations toward a full EPA are expected to continue in the course of 2010, differences still remain between central Africa and the EU. Issues which still need to be addressed include: the structure and extent of central Africa’s tariff elimination offer, development assistance support and trade in services, all of which are accorded a high priority by the EC.